A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read moreOnline access to civil and criminal cases in decide on circuit courts. Cases may be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of in the future within the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of your alleged prevalence along with the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to become the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't react in the least for the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous events that extra judicial confession of the accused is a weak sort of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is usually counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners with each other with a motorcycle at 4.
Deterrence: The concern of severe consequences, such as more info capital punishment, is meant to discourage probable criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders preserving in view that one of several respondents has retired from service as pointed out through the counsel for the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
When the petitioner is simply present at the place of prevalence without causing any injury towards the deceased or PWs then in this kind of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided because of the uncovered trial Court after recording from the evidence.
Online access into a statewide search of adult criminal case information in the juvenile & domestic relations district courts, criminal and traffic case information in general district courts and choose circuit courts. Note: Payments cannot be made using this system.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same form of case.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and possible hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, even though observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have destructive effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out from the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Progress, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.